Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Brian Lowry Posts

Brian Lowry, the chief TV critic for Variety, has written a couple interesting columns in the last week presenting the two sides of the television coin: one on the declining quality of reality TV, the other about television's storytelling advantage.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Assessing the Oscar Nominations

Best Picture

And I thought Gran Torino -- in my Clint Eastwood paranoia -- was going to be the spoiler. Instead, we get The Reader. The film's post-production was plagued with problems. (Harvey Weinstein harassed both Anthony Minghella's widow and ailing Sydney Pollack to get the film out in 2008; he really shouldn't be rewarded for this.) But alas, as I said, perhaps the Academy felt sympathetic toward the plight of Daldry and his editor, and also wanted to honor Minghella/Pollack. I suppose that somewhat respectable, but still...

Wall-E probably should have gotten a best picture nod. If any animated film ever should, it's this one. The Dark Knight is about the best synergy of box office and critical acclaim that anyone could hope for, so if it can't get nominated, there's no hope for such films anymore.

Slumdog, Frost/Nixon, and Milk were good choices. Benjamin Button was an obvious choice. Slumdog's going to win.

Directing

Daldry? Really? How does this guy keep getting nominated? He's a suberb craftsmen, but c'mon, he hardly takes any material to the next level. Nolan was again snubbed after a DGA nom, as was the case with Memento. Darren Aronofsky took an average script and make a pretty damn good movie out of The Wrestler. And then there's Mike Leigh. What about him?

What I liked: Gus Van Sant is too often ignored; he's made a bunch of good, though perhaps somewhat ephemeral, films over his career. He took an average script and made a better film out of Milk. Ron Howard is Ron Howard; Danny Boyle is finally getting the credit he deserves; and Fincher is nominated for what I think is his fourth best film.

Original Screenplay

Frozen River was surprising; I thought The Visitor would get the East Coast indie slot. Mike Leigh was good to see. Every film he makes should be nominated in this category; he's that good. I missed In Bruges, and I'm sorry that I did. Milk doesn't really deserve it, for a couple different reasons.

Rachel's Getting Married was snubbed, and so especially was Vicky Christina Barcelona. I guess the Academy's sick of the names Woody Allen and Lumet. I would have liked to see Synecdoche, but that's just me.

Adapted Screenplay

I have no gripes, except that (like Best Picture) The Reader was chosen over The Dark Knight (or, for that matter, Revolutionary Road).

Actor

No complaints, though I expected Eastwood to get a lifetime-achievement-in-acting nomination. Perhaps, he got that back in 2004. According to Nikki Finke, the Academy is too jealous of him now to bestow nominations for such a slight film. In this case, jealousy is a worthwhile thing.

Jenkins was a good pick, but I was surprised by it. The film came out almost a year ago.

Actress

I would have liked to see Hawkings in here over Jolie. I am ecstatic that Melissa Leo got nominated. I watched her for five years on Homicide: Life on the Street, and I think she gave a strong performance in Frozen River.

Supping Actor


I was very happy that Michael Shannon got nominated. I still think that he was the star of the movie (for his 10 minute performance), but that may just be because I agreed with everything his "crazy" character said. Robert Downey, Jr., has done a lot of great work in the years since Chaplin, so it's nice to see some kind of recognition for him. Health Ledger, of course, is going to win and deservingly so.

Supping Actress

I guess Winslet's Reader performance was considered a leading role, as it should have been. As such, this list makes sense.


And finally: Bruce Sprinstreen "The Wrestler" = not good enough to make the nomination threshold. You've got to be kidding me. It was a perfect coda to that film's great ending.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Readers' Responses to Murdoch's Acquistion of the WSJ

"This news is like hearing from an old friend that he has a debilitating, fatal disease. You know that things will continue as they are for awhile, but you also know that the future looks bleak. Maybe the NYT will pick up some of the reporters and beef up its business coverage. It'll be tough to say goodbye when the transition is complete."

"Cancel my subscription."

"Great, so now we can read Murdoch's right-wing-ranting tabloid tirade in corporate receptions too."

"I grieve for the Journal because it will never be the same. Murdoch will defile it and turn it into another example of his legendarily low-brow offerings. No agreement for editorial independence will endure -- it's not worth the paper on which it is printed. The craven Bancroft family should slink away in shame to ruminate on what they have done to one of the last beacons of American journalism."

"I have enjoyed reading the Wall Street Journal for many years. When the news of the buyout was going through I immediately called Customer Service and canceled my subscription to WSJ and WSJ.com."

"Will Geraldo Rivera get a column? If so, put me down for another subscription."

"As a long time WSJ subscriber, I am very saddened by this pending takeover. As such, I will cancel my print and online subscription immediately upon official announcement that this deal has actually taken place. At least my $ will not go to supporting News Corp and the brand of 'journalism' that it practices. It's disgusting to think that this deal would even be considered by the controlling interests of Dow Jones let alone acted upon.

My hope is that there will be a last second change of heart and that integrity and honor will win out over greed. But that is not important any longer in todays society. All you have to do is read the news."

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

B.S.

Britney's out of rehab.
She's gone bald, apparently because of lice.
I guess she wanted to match her head to her undercarriage,
which we've all seen thanks to panty-less nights.

Her ex-hubby wasn't a very good rapper.
Nor was he a very good lover.
Britney's one hell of a mother
Back to rehab she goes.

Monday, February 12, 2007

ANS

Who cares about Anna Nicole Smith?

Not me.

Friday, July 14, 2006

Musings

To muse for a second over the purpose of this blog:

Is cultural critique pointless? Some might argue that it is. I do not mean to take myself especially serious, hence the name of this particular collection of rants. I want to create a semi-formal environment to talk about culture and society, without the prentension of any particular recognized importance. This is just simply blabbing and one could label it "without purpose". But I will continue to do it, to waste my time if you will.

One note about my setting: I'm now writing from the US Capital of Washington DC. No longer am I an Angeleno. Let's see if the different location affects my perpespective. Inside the Beltway I go.

Oh, and a final LA restaurant list is forthcoming...

Saturday, April 15, 2006

New Restautants

In the past year, several restaurants have
gained prominence. Here are some of the best:

Ortolan (French, Melrose)
Providence (Seafood, Melrose)
The Hungry Cat (Seafood, Hollywood)
Beacon (Asian Fushion, Culver City)